Nanoblogging or Microblogging ?! ((And More Video Blogging ))
Nanoblogging ? Wasn't this called Microblogging when I was younger, or maybe it's not the same and I'm too old to understand ;)
((I don't care about definitions and I don't think it deserves a different name but then I also think the SMS/MMS standards are basically useless if everybody used mobile ((push notification)) mail in the future so don't ask me ;))...
http://www.webware.com/8301-1_109-9911272-2.html?tag=nefd.top
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_twitter_clients_definitive_list.php
Or maybe they should just follow the Apple trademarks: Blogging, Miniblogging, Nanoblogging. More on the mentioned video blog who is buying the Nano stuff here...
http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/08/loic-le-meurs-new-startup-launches-seesmic/
Interesting seeing video blogging going forward in view of ((sort of)) personalized TV stations by around 2010 when everyone will have a fast enough connection ((at least in Japan)) on the go...
http://gizmodo.com/372331/super-3g-successfully-tested-at-250mbps
YouTube evolution indeed ((there are others working on this such as Kyte.tv and others I hadn't heard of a lot before such as Qik...
http://qik.com/
The Kyte CEO of course sees a lot of differences ((I agree there's more than Microblogging vs Nanoblogging here ;))
http://www.centernetworks.com/kyte-comparison-flixwagon-seesmic-qik
If YouTube is not asleep ((and the US finally gets LTE/WiMAX coverage)) it has Google money to crush or gobble up most of these competitors and enter dominate the live, mobile TV/blogging market in the future.